Paul writes – I commented, in passing (in this post) that an interesting question
about Baptism had been asked of Dave Tomlinson at Finlay Park – the question
was in the context of Dave talking about “borderless churches” and went
something like this: ““if
we’re talking about “(church) communities without borders” and “churches
without ‘border control’” where then do practices such as baptism and
confirmation fit?”
Anyway, here are some
thoughts on Baptism via Jason Goroncy that I’d like to add to any conversation that might arise in response to the
above question.
“…Baptism is both God’s sign
to humanity that we have been redeemed by Christ, and humanity’s sign
to God that we are willing partners in God’s work of reconciliation. Baptism,
in other words, finds its basis in the hypostatic union through which God draws
near to humanity and humanity draws near to God. Jesus Christ is the one
mediator between God and humanity. It is the prius of the divine ecomony
in the incarnation that baptism testifies chiefly to, and not to any subjective
attainment of our confession, which might change. To put it another way,
baptism is nothing less than our participation in the full and vicarious
humanity of the Son of God.”
Jason then quotes Bonhoeffer:
“Formation comes only by being drawn into the life of Jesus Christ.
It comes only as formation in His likeness, as conformation with the unique
form of Him who was made man, was crucified and rose again…” You can read all of Jason's post here.
This in turn got me thinking
about a statement author Marilynne
Robinson made when asked, in effect, whether religion was needful in living
the moral life, particularly as there are a good many very moral people for
whom religious commitment is not a part of their life. I wove some of her
response into my own statement of what I heard as she responded:
“…Religion is not [ultimately, as many suppose, about morality]… It is about what the
nature of being is… [It opens us]
to the mystery of experience for which religion supplies wonderful images and
vocabularly and in doing so opens us to a much larger [horizon and] understanding than one would have without it…”
“…Often when people ‘change’ they
really do become themselves [i.e. they change toward themselves]; it’s not like a difference enters into them. It’s
like, for some reason or other, they’ve been distracted away from their own human centre] – who they most deeply are…”
Other sculpturers saw a big
block of stone, Michelangelo saw
David and set out to reveal him.
Every bit of stone that was chipped away was a change toward revealing David.
Recent Comments